<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR Firms that Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prosintraining.com/2006/08/pr-firms-that-blog.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prosintraining.com/2006/08/pr-firms-that-blog.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.prosintraining.com/2006/08/pr-firms-that-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vervenorthwest.com/prosintraining.com/?p=14#comment-12</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite blogs, PR Squared (http://www.pr-squared.com) provides a nice mix of both, which is my preference. What good is commentary without real life examples, insight, etc.? The fact is that most PR bloggers are practicing professionals and it would be shorting the readers, as well as pretty darn hard, to not include that professional knowledge in their blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite blogs, PR Squared (<a href="http://www.pr-squared.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pr-squared.com</a>) provides a nice mix of both, which is my preference. What good is commentary without real life examples, insight, etc.? The fact is that most PR bloggers are practicing professionals and it would be shorting the readers, as well as pretty darn hard, to not include that professional knowledge in their blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

